Marcelo Ignacio Barros Troncoso vs David Tixhon Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L L W L L
Form
L W L L W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Troncoso 1 - 0 Tixhon
They have played 3 sets in total, with Troncoso winning 2 and Tixhon winning 1. The last match between Troncoso and Tixhon was at the Belgium F2 (Arlon), 26-06-2017, Q1 round, Clay with Marcelo Ignacio Barros Troncoso getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marcelo Ignacio Barros Troncoso | 1 |
| David Tixhon | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marcelo Ignacio Barros Troncoso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Luis Molina
Player
Marcelo Ignacio Barros Troncoso
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcelo Ignacio Barros Troncoso
Player
Edan Andree Benitez
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Zaidman
Player
Marcelo Ignacio Barros Troncoso
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
107)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
David Tixhon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mats Bredschneijder
Player
David Tixhon
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
61
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 1-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Tixhon
Player
Harry Leruth
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Huens
Player
David Tixhon
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
David Tixhon
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34% (36/70) | Win/Loss | 38% (8/13) |
| 36% (83/145) | Sets Win/Loss | 43% (21/28) |
| 43% (828/1098) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (205/232) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 11 | Aces Total | 12 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 22 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 144.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 252.1 |
| 61% (337/555) | 1st Serve % | 58% (139/238) |
| 57% (191/337) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (96/139) |
| 45% (98/218) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (38/99) |
| 49% (17/35) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (14/27) |
| 35% (182/523) | Return Points Win % | 45% (96/211) |
| 34% (36/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (8/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (7/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 31% (5/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 86% (37/32) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (9/8) |
| 14% (37/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (9/1) |
| 6% (69/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (12/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
